An Indian judge is receiving death threats and online abuse after sentencing 14 men to life in prison for lynching a man accused of smuggling cows. The judge, Tabassum Khan, found the men guilty of murder, attempted murder, and other charges related to the 2022 attack on Nazir Ahmad, a 50-year-old man who was transporting cattle at night.

The men, self-styled “cow protectors,” intercepted Ahmad’s vehicle and brutally assaulted him and his companions, leading to Ahmad’s death. Khan’s verdict has sparked a wave of hate and intolerance, with numerous videos and social media posts targeting her Muslim faith and calling for violence against her.

Cow Vigilantism in India

The case highlights the growing concern of cow vigilantism in India, where Hindus consider cows sacred and killing them is illegal in many states. The attack on Ahmad was a clear case of mob lynching, according to Khan’s judgment, but the verdict has been met with resistance and anger from Hindu right-wing groups.

Leading judicial bodies have rallied behind Khan, condemning the threats and abuse she has faced, and she has been given police protection. The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and the Supreme Court Bar Association have demanded action against those responsible for the threats, calling them a grave issue that undermines the fundamentals of democracy.

Implications and Reactions

The attacks on Khan have sparked widespread concern and outrage, with many calling for greater protection for judges and a stronger response to hate crimes. The incident has also highlighted the growing tension between India’s Muslim minority and Hindu majority, with many Muslims living in fear of violence and intimidation.

The case has significant implications for the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary in India, with many fearing that the threats and abuse faced by Khan could have a chilling effect on judges and their ability to dispense justice. As the Indian government grapples with the issue of cow vigilantism and hate crimes, the case serves as a reminder of the need for greater protection and support for judges and minority communities.